Off-the-cuff opinions from random guys on the internet are not the best foundation for creating TE Premium Rankings. You wouldn’t buy a house with a cracked or leaking basement, would you? No! The foundation for anything is critical.
At Draft Sharks, our Dynasty Rankings are based on data—a lot of it. We start with a player's baseline, a weighted average of this year’s projection, and their last two seasons. Then we use 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year fantasy forecasted output. This isn't guesswork. Our process has been built using machine learning for all NFL data since 1999. We determine this output using scientifically-sound performance aging curves and retirement rates. And these numbers are specific to both positional groups and archetypes of players. These are the smartest fantasy football projections on the market. Period.
3D values+ then apply a weighted average of those 1-,3-,5- and 10-year projections and a cross-positional algorithm based on your exact league setup and scoring. The results are an unparalleled single (true) value you can use universally on the site. That means you can use these values for ranking in the preseason, regular season, and trade valuations.
Ready to go for the gold? In the Draft War Room you can adjust the weighting even heavier toward year-one projection in "Win Now" mode.
|
RK
|
Player
|
ADP | Bye | Age | 1yr. Proj | 3yr. Proj | 5yr. Proj | 10yr. Proj | DS Analysis | 3D Value + | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
|
RK
TE7
|
6.12 | 18 | 21 | 170 | 589 | 1,015 | 2,059 | Sadiq is an elite athlete who uses his footwork and leaping ability to get open and make catches. He is extremely tough to cover and can box out when contested. He led the Ducks in receptions this year despite numerous drops. Sadiq may not add much as a blocking presence, but he could be a top-15 pick with his ability as a receiver. | 43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
1015
10yr. Proj
2059
ADP
6.12
Bye
18
Age
21
DS Analysis
Sadiq is an elite athlete who uses his footwork and leaping ability to get open and make catches. He is extremely tough to cover and can box out when contested. He led the Ducks in receptions this year despite numerous drops. Sadiq may not add much as a blocking presence, but he could be a top-15 pick with his ability as a receiver.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2
|
RK
TE14
|
10.11 | 18 | 22.9 | 135 | 459 | 783 | 1,455 | Stowers is a former QB converted to TE. He will be more slot WR than TE, sitting at 6'4, 235 pounds. He led Vanderbilt with 62 catches last year and was a reliable option for QB Diego Pavia. Stowers has elite explosiveness and short-area quickness, and that was reflected in his excellent Combine performance. He should sneak into Day 2 and become an impact fantasy player with enough playing time. | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
783
10yr. Proj
1455
ADP
10.11
Bye
18
Age
22.9
DS Analysis
Stowers is a former QB converted to TE. He will be more slot WR than TE, sitting at 6'4, 235 pounds. He led Vanderbilt with 62 catches last year and was a reliable option for QB Diego Pavia. Stowers has elite explosiveness and short-area quickness, and that was reflected in his excellent Combine performance. He should sneak into Day 2 and become an impact fantasy player with enough playing time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3
|
RK
TE36
|
19.03 | 18 | 22.7 | 115 | 353 | 603 | 1,120 | Klare broke out at Purdue in 2024 with 51-685-4. He took a step back on the Buckeyes last year at 43-448-2, but he showed improved blocking and good route running to be a shallow target. He did have some drops and mental lapses, but Klare can be a Jake Ferguson-type TE. | -13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
603
10yr. Proj
1120
ADP
19.03
Bye
18
Age
22.7
DS Analysis
Klare broke out at Purdue in 2024 with 51-685-4. He took a step back on the Buckeyes last year at 43-448-2, but he showed improved blocking and good route running to be a shallow target. He did have some drops and mental lapses, but Klare can be a Jake Ferguson-type TE.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4
|
RK
TE37
|
19.10 | 18 | 23.8 | 107 | 369 | 597 | 1,071 | Trigg was a highly recruited TE who started at USC. He transferred to Ole Miss and did very little before finally finding a good home at Baylor. His output: 50 catches, 694 yards, and 6 scores. Trigg's athleticism allows him to do damage after the catch at 6'4, 240 pounds. He has receiving upside and could sneak into Day 2. | -14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
597
10yr. Proj
1071
ADP
19.10
Bye
18
Age
0
DS Analysis
Trigg was a highly recruited TE who started at USC. He transferred to Ole Miss and did very little before finally finding a good home at Baylor. His output: 50 catches, 694 yards, and 6 scores. Trigg's athleticism allows him to do damage after the catch at 6'4, 240 pounds. He has receiving upside and could sneak into Day 2.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5
|
RK
TE41
|
N/A | 18 | 23.2 | 86 | 322 | 548 | 1,019 | Koziol went 94-839-8 in 2024 with Ball State before transferring to Houston. His 74-727-6 showcases Koziol's pass-catching prowess. His massive wingspan makes him a mismatch at 6'7, 250 pounds. He can be used as a red zone option in the NFL, though he lacks the leverage needed as a blocker. He could be an intriguing sleeper in the right situation. | -24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
548
10yr. Proj
1019
ADP
N/A
Bye
18
Age
23.2
DS Analysis
Koziol went 94-839-8 in 2024 with Ball State before transferring to Houston. His 74-727-6 showcases Koziol's pass-catching prowess. His massive wingspan makes him a mismatch at 6'7, 250 pounds. He can be used as a red zone option in the NFL, though he lacks the leverage needed as a blocker. He could be an intriguing sleeper in the right situation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6
|
RK
TE43
|
367.07 | 18 | 22.8 | 86 | 295 | 504 | 936 | Roush has improved every season, topping out at 49-545-2 in 2025 for Stanford. At 6'5, 260 pounds, he brings excellent size and blocking ability, but there's also some red zone upside here. Roush could get drafted in the middle rounds in April. | -29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
504
10yr. Proj
936
ADP
367.07
Bye
18
Age
22.8
DS Analysis
Roush has improved every season, topping out at 49-545-2 in 2025 for Stanford. At 6'5, 260 pounds, he brings excellent size and blocking ability, but there's also some red zone upside here. Roush could get drafted in the middle rounds in April.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7
|
RK
TE51
|
363.09 | 18 | 22.7 | 87 | 217 | 370 | 687 | Joly has been a consistent producer, with three straight seasons over 480 yards receiving. He continued thriving after transferring up from UConn to NC State. Joly has in-line capabilities and is a solid blocker. He's also an ideal red zone threat when he boxes out. | -48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
370
10yr. Proj
687
ADP
363.09
Bye
18
Age
22.7
DS Analysis
Joly has been a consistent producer, with three straight seasons over 480 yards receiving. He continued thriving after transferring up from UConn to NC State. Joly has in-line capabilities and is a solid blocker. He's also an ideal red zone threat when he boxes out.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8
|
RK
TE53
|
367.09 | 18 | 22.6 | 85 | 202 | 344 | 639 | Delp is an H-Back who continues in the line of great Georgia TEs. He went 20-261-1 and was used as a lead blocker often throughout the season. That blocking may get him drafted higher than his production indicates, but Delp's soft hands could be enough to become a better pro than college player. | -52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
344
10yr. Proj
639
ADP
367.09
Bye
18
Age
22.6
DS Analysis
Delp is an H-Back who continues in the line of great Georgia TEs. He went 20-261-1 and was used as a lead blocker often throughout the season. That blocking may get him drafted higher than his production indicates, but Delp's soft hands could be enough to become a better pro than college player.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9
|
RK
TE54
|
24.03 | 18 | 21.8 | 87 | 186 | 342 | 664 | Endries transferred from Cal to Texas to replace Gunnar Helm and had a connection with QB Arch Manning. He went 33-346-3. He is a good route runner who can play in-line or in the slot. With soft hands, Endries has starter upside if he ends up in the right situation. | -53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
342
10yr. Proj
664
ADP
24.03
Bye
18
Age
21.8
DS Analysis
Endries transferred from Cal to Texas to replace Gunnar Helm and had a connection with QB Arch Manning. He went 33-346-3. He is a good route runner who can play in-line or in the slot. With soft hands, Endries has starter upside if he ends up in the right situation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10
|
RK
TE63
|
N/A | 18 | 22.1 | 81 | 135 | 248 | 483 | Royer transferred from Ohio State to Cincinnati. He went 29-416-4 with QB Brendan Sorsby, a potential Round 1 pick in 2027. A soft hands in-line TE at 6'5, 250 pounds, Royer will make his NFL bones as a blocker. He could be the occasional end zone target as well, but don't expect huge fantasy numbers. | -67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
248
10yr. Proj
483
ADP
N/A
Bye
18
Age
22.1
DS Analysis
Royer transferred from Ohio State to Cincinnati. He went 29-416-4 with QB Brendan Sorsby, a potential Round 1 pick in 2027. A soft hands in-line TE at 6'5, 250 pounds, Royer will make his NFL bones as a blocker. He could be the occasional end zone target as well, but don't expect huge fantasy numbers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11
|
RK
TE68
|
368.07 | 18 | 23.5 | 88 | 127 | 205 | 367 | Klein replaced Colston Loveland at Michigan but dealt with nagging injuries over the course of the season. He is another elite athlete who showcases good blocking and soft hands. Klein isn't on the production level of Loveland, but he could be a sleeper TE in this class. | -72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
205
10yr. Proj
367
ADP
368.07
Bye
18
Age
23.5
DS Analysis
Klein replaced Colston Loveland at Michigan but dealt with nagging injuries over the course of the season. He is another elite athlete who showcases good blocking and soft hands. Klein isn't on the production level of Loveland, but he could be a sleeper TE in this class.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12
|
RK
TE70
|
366.03 | 18 | 23.1 | 72 | 115 | 195 | 363 | Gyllenborg flashed as a receiving weapon for Wyoming in 2024, going 30-425-3. He dealt with injuries in 2025, taking a step back, but Gyllenborg would be a receiving TE who could emerge with opportunity. | -75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
195
10yr. Proj
363
ADP
366.03
Bye
18
Age
23.1
DS Analysis
Gyllenborg flashed as a receiving weapon for Wyoming in 2024, going 30-425-3. He dealt with injuries in 2025, taking a step back, but Gyllenborg would be a receiving TE who could emerge with opportunity.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
13
|
RK
TE71
|
368.11 | 18 | 24.5 | 61 | 119 | 193 | 345 | Boerkircher is one of the best blocking TEs in the draft, but he boasts an excellent catch radius and range in the red zone. After spending four years as a back-up at Nebraska, he became the top TE for Texas A&M in 2025. Despite only having 19 catches, he did score 3 TDs. He will likely be a No. 2 TE on a team that specializes as a blocker. | -76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
193
10yr. Proj
345
ADP
368.11
Bye
18
Age
0
DS Analysis
Boerkircher is one of the best blocking TEs in the draft, but he boasts an excellent catch radius and range in the red zone. After spending four years as a back-up at Nebraska, he became the top TE for Texas A&M in 2025. Despite only having 19 catches, he did score 3 TDs. He will likely be a No. 2 TE on a team that specializes as a blocker.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
14
|
RK
TE74
|
N/A | 18 | 21.7 | 36 | 108 | 199 | 386 | Maryland is a receiving first TE who had consistent production over his four years at SMU. Though he won't test very well, Maryland could make a fantasy impact if he receives playing time. | -78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
199
10yr. Proj
386
ADP
N/A
Bye
18
Age
21.7
DS Analysis
Maryland is a receiving first TE who had consistent production over his four years at SMU. Though he won't test very well, Maryland could make a fantasy impact if he receives playing time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
15
|
RK
TE77
|
N/A | 18 | 22.3 | 33 | 56 | 102 | 199 | Bentley earned the starting job at Utah, going 48-620-6 this past season. A solid blocker with soft hands, he lacks starting TE upside but could contribute as a No. 2 TE. | -91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
102
10yr. Proj
199
ADP
N/A
Bye
18
Age
22.3
DS Analysis
Bentley earned the starting job at Utah, going 48-620-6 this past season. A solid blocker with soft hands, he lacks starting TE upside but could contribute as a No. 2 TE.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
16
|
RK
TE79
|
369.03 | 18 | 23.5 | 68 | 21 | 35 | 62 | McRee spent his entire five-year career at USC and peaked in 2025, going for 30-450-4. McRee is a solid blocker and a soft hands catcher who was a reliable third-down option for the Trojans. He's a candidate to be drafted late on Day 3. | -98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
35
10yr. Proj
62
ADP
369.03
Bye
18
Age
23.5
DS Analysis
McRee spent his entire five-year career at USC and peaked in 2025, going for 30-450-4. McRee is a solid blocker and a soft hands catcher who was a reliable third-down option for the Trojans. He's a candidate to be drafted late on Day 3.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
17
|
RK
TE80
|
N/A | 18 | 22.1 | 0 | 39 | 72 | 140 | -98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
72
10yr. Proj
140
ADP
N/A
Bye
18
Age
22.1
DS Analysis
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
18
|
RK
TE81
|
369.12 | 18 | 22.5 | 75 | 17 | 19 | 30 | Cuevas found his largest role on Alabama's offense in 2025, going for 37-411-4. He figures to be a primary blocking TE at 256 pounds, but Cuevas does offer some red zone upside with his contested catching ability. Expect him to be a Day 3 pick. | -100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
19
10yr. Proj
30
ADP
369.12
Bye
18
Age
22.5
DS Analysis
Cuevas found his largest role on Alabama's offense in 2025, going for 37-411-4. He figures to be a primary blocking TE at 256 pounds, but Cuevas does offer some red zone upside with his contested catching ability. Expect him to be a Day 3 pick.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
19
|
RK
TE82
|
367.05 | 18 | 24 | 33 | 27 | 43 | 78 | Hibner's size and quick feet make him a great blocking TE and a reliable red zone option. He went 31-436-4 at SMU last year and worked more downfield as the season went on. | -100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
43
10yr. Proj
78
ADP
367.05
Bye
18
Age
24
DS Analysis
Hibner's size and quick feet make him a great blocking TE and a reliable red zone option. He went 31-436-4 at SMU last year and worked more downfield as the season went on.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
20
|
RK
TE83
|
N/A | 18 | 24.1 | 41 | 24 | 27 | 41 | Nowakowski was overshadowed by the WRs at Indiana, but he was a reliable target for Fernando Mendoza. His 32-387-2 season in 2025 showcased strong blocking and great stick routes against zone coverage. Nowakowski is a do it all TE who should get drafted. | -101 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
27
10yr. Proj
41
ADP
N/A
Bye
18
Age
24.1
DS Analysis
Nowakowski was overshadowed by the WRs at Indiana, but he was a reliable target for Fernando Mendoza. His 32-387-2 season in 2025 showcased strong blocking and great stick routes against zone coverage. Nowakowski is a do it all TE who should get drafted.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
21
|
RK
TE84
|
N/A | 18 | 23.4 | 15 | 25 | 42 | 78 | Bredeson likely will play a FB/H-Back role in the NFL which may make him unusable for fantasy. He is a blocker first who catches the occasional pass. | -102 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
42
10yr. Proj
78
ADP
N/A
Bye
18
Age
23.4
DS Analysis
Bredeson likely will play a FB/H-Back role in the NFL which may make him unusable for fantasy. He is a blocker first who catches the occasional pass.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
22
|
RK
TE85
|
368.06 | 18 | 23 | 26 | 18 | 30 | 56 | Sharp was a high school QB who transitioned to TE at SE Louisiana. He transferred up to Oklahoma, then LSU, as he improved at the position. Sharp is still raw, going for 24-252-2 this past season. | -102 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
30
10yr. Proj
56
ADP
368.06
Bye
18
Age
23
DS Analysis
Sharp was a high school QB who transitioned to TE at SE Louisiana. He transferred up to Oklahoma, then LSU, as he improved at the position. Sharp is still raw, going for 24-252-2 this past season.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
23
|
RK
TE86
|
366.10 | 18 | 22.5 | 26 | 18 | 30 | 56 | Wright has some upside as a pass catching TE who went 39-635-5 at Ole Miss this past season. He remains a bit stiff in his route running and can drop passes, but there is some upside. | -102 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
30
10yr. Proj
56
ADP
366.10
Bye
18
Age
22.5
DS Analysis
Wright has some upside as a pass catching TE who went 39-635-5 at Ole Miss this past season. He remains a bit stiff in his route running and can drop passes, but there is some upside.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
24
|
RK
TE87
|
N/A | 18 | 23.1 | 33 | 15 | 26 | 49 | Kacmarek played second fiddle to Max Klare at Ohio State, but he was just as reliable a target. A blocker first with long arms at 6'6, Kacmarek does have soft hands and is dependable underneath. He could make a roster. | -102 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
26
10yr. Proj
49
ADP
N/A
Bye
18
Age
23.1
DS Analysis
Kacmarek played second fiddle to Max Klare at Ohio State, but he was just as reliable a target. A blocker first with long arms at 6'6, Kacmarek does have soft hands and is dependable underneath. He could make a roster.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
25
|
RK
TE88
|
N/A | 18 | 22.1 | 31 | 14 | 25 | 48 | Kanak only has one year of TE experience under his belt. He started his career as an LB before transitioning to TE in 2025. He went 44-533-0 despite the unfamiliarity with the position. Kanak has upside as he continues developing. | -103 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5yr. Proj
25
10yr. Proj
48
ADP
N/A
Bye
18
Age
22.1
DS Analysis
Kanak only has one year of TE experience under his belt. He started his career as an LB before transitioning to TE in 2025. He went 44-533-0 despite the unfamiliarity with the position. Kanak has upside as he continues developing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We have the tools to help you manage your team like a real NFL GM. Coaches like Belichick, McVay, and Reid all have an entire analytics team at their disposal -- from Draft Night and through the offseason. Now you do too!
With tools that:
We’ve built a whole suite of Dynasty Tools to help you draft, trade, and research like a champion. You're the manager. We're here to help.
Explore Your New Dynasty Tools »
You have our personal money-back guarantee: If you’re not happy with our service for any reason, just reach out by December 31, 2026, and we’ll give you 100% of your subscription money back. No strings attached. You can cancel with one-click from your account page anytime.