Show Navigation
Show Menu

Thoughts on “The Correlation Matrix that Answers Every Question You’ve Ever Had About DFS Stacking”

By Jared Smola 7:33pm EDT 10/20/15

   

RotoViz is one of my go-to sources for quality, data-informed fantasy football research. But the take-aways from “ The Correlation Matrix that Answers Every Question You’ve Ever Had About DFS Stacking" are bit too black and white for me. The author might agree. “Truth be told, you might still have questions after reading this post. In fact, you might have more questions…”

Fact.

The Data

In most data driven research problems, roughly 90% of a data analyst’s time is spent on getting and cleaning the data. This has to be done prior to any analysis and frames any conclusions that can be made from the results.

In this article, there is no insight into the data used. Single week, year, multiple years? Scoring format? Number of samples?

No clue.

How was the data constructed with the opposing team players? How did the researcher determine which was team X and which was team Y? Home vs away? Favored vs underdog? Random? Did the researcher even think to avoid redundancy, stacking Team A’s K with Team B’s D and then Team B’s D with Team A’s K?

Because of the below x team correlation values being the same as those for team y, I highly suspect redundancy is an issue in any x,y correlations. For example, the WR2 QB1 correlation for the x teams look to be exactly the same as those in the y teams (as do every other pair compared in x and y).

x.WR2 x.QB1 0.39

y.WR2 y.QB1 0.39

I used player week data from 2014 based on FanDuel scoring as my source data (the week 12 match-up between KC and OAK was for some reason missing from the source file). In creating a data set to compare against the article’s results, I actually found it necessary to create multiple data sets to critique some of the take-aways of the author. First, to compare relationships within a team I created a data set with every team week including scores for K, D, QB1, QB2, RB1, RB2, RB3, RB4, WR1, WR2, WR3, WR4, WR5, WR6, TE1, and TE2. Roster depth was determined by weekly salary.

Avoiding the redundancy issue caused by taking this table and simply pairing each team with their opponent for that week is important. This causes a duplication of every data point reflected over the y=x line. This may cause an increased scatter in the data and/or inflated p values due to the increased sample size. Since there are multiple ways to consider match-ups, I created 4 match-up tables:

  • Favorites vs. Underdogs (Based on spreads sourced from http://www.footballlocks.com) (255 cases)
  • Home vs. Away (London games and the relocated Jets@Buffalo game were omitted) (251 cases)
  • Random Selection 1 of Team A vs Opponent (255 cases)
  • Random Selection 2 of Team A vs Opponent (255 cases)

For comparisons sake, I also created the redundant table.

Correlations

Correlations don’t tell the whole story. Just because something has high correlation doesn’t mean the linear relationship is especially influential. You need to consider the actual slope of the regression line to determine the impact one variable has on another in the comparison model. The question we really want to be able to answer is: "How many points are we expected to add to our team by utilizing a particular stack?”

P values are omitted. Many of the r values are likely statistically insignificant and yet they are all shared as meaningful in the article’s matrix and table. The claims made in takeaway number 6 are likely wrong. With such small correlation coefficients, I expect the p values to be high (unless the sample is extremely large) suggesting an insignificant linear relationship. So, to claim that x.QB1 has a negative correlation with y.WR1 and positive with y.WR2 would be wrong.

Without further tests, the claim in takeaway number 1 that the correlation between x.WR2 (and the not mentioned x.WR3) and x.QB is higher than that with x.WR1 is presumptive. The values are close enough that, depending on the sample, the difference may be insignificant. And as mentioned earlier, the slopes/influence would tell a more useful story.

The r values (correlation coefficients) themselves are hard to interpret. It would have been wise to provide r^2 values, as well. This would then express the percentage of variation explained in one variable by the other. For example, the strongest linear relationship in their study, K vs opposing D, had a -0.50 correlation. A kickers performance could explain 25% of an opposing D’s performance.

Further, correlations only check for linear relationships, which I do expect in this data as well, but any quadratic or logarithmic relationships may be overlooked.

In “tCMtAEQYEHADS”, the author claims kicker versus opposing defense has a -0.5 correlation statistic. Summary of the related correlations from my data:

  • favorite K vs underdog D -0.38
  • undog K vs favorite D -0.47
  • home K vs away D -0.41
  • away K vs home D -0.46
  • rand(1) team K vs opponent D -0.42
  • rand(1) opponent K vs team D -0.36
  • rand(2) team K vs opponent D -0.39
  • rand(2) opponent K vs team D -0.46
  • redundant team K vs opponent D -0.44
  • redundant opponent K vs team D -0.44

So, you can see the importance of framing your data for the reader.

In take-away 2, the author states a RB1 has a negative correlation with all TEs and WRs from the same team. In my study, only RB1 and WR1 (using the Random 1 set) had a statistically significant linear relationship (although the correlation was still small at 0.11) and it was positive, not negative.

Take-aways 3 and 5 are supported in my data. Take-away 4 of opposing Ks and Ds having a negative correlation is also supported, but the same can be said for a D and any opposing offensive player, especially QB (even more so than K).

Take-away 6 is partially supported. A WR2 does seem to have a statistically significant positive correlation with the opposing QB (again, using the Random 1 set). However, the linear relationship between the WR1 and the opposing QB is statistically insignificant.

Finally in take-away 7, based on my data (again, using the Random 1 set), opposing QBs, RB2s, WR1s, WR2s and TE1s do not have significant linear relationships. Opposing RB1s and WR4s do have a negative linear relationship, although not a high correlation. Opposing WR3s do have a positive linear relationship, although, again not a high correlation.

We could easily have different (and more useful) take-aways when considering favorite vs. underdog or home vs. away match-ups. That just reiterates the importance of framing the questions you’re trying to answer as a researcher.

Next Steps

  • Expand data set beyond 2014.
  • Review scatter plots for non-linear relationships
  • Run Principal Component Analysis on tables to determine grouped relationships instead of paired relationships.
  • Create regression models to determine the strength of the influence of explanatory variables on response variables.

Chasing Upside in Stacking Teammates

Below are the results of an ongoing stacking study (limited to players from the same team) with a slightly different approach. I believe this is more actionable information. The question that I’m intending to answer is, “if I can identify a top performing player at position X should I stack them with a teammate at position Y?”

  1. Using 2014 FanDuel data, identify top N players each week at primary position.
  2. Stack with secondary position limiting to a certain depth on roster (WR1, WR2, etc.)
  3. Compare stacked player to alternative at similar salary (within 100 dollars)
  • Top 5 Qb with WR1 +6.5 points better than alternative at similar price (313 cases)
  • Top 15 WR with QB1 +3.9 points better than alternative at similar price (392 cases)
  • Top 5 Qb with WR2 +4.0 points better than alternative at similar price (579 cases)
  • Top 5 Qb with WR3 +1.1 points better than alternative at similar price (691 cases)
  • Top 5 Qb with TE1 +1.3 points better than alternative at similar price (385 cases)
  • Top 5 TE with QB1 +2.9 points better than alternative at similar price (126 cases)
  • Top 5 QB with RB1 +2.2 points better than alternative at similar price (234 cases)
  • Top 10 RB with QB1 +1.2 points better than alternative at similar price (260 cases)
  • Top 5 QB with RB2 statistically insignificant relationship (538 cases)
  • Top 5 QB with D -.9 points worse than alternative at similar price (512 cases)
  • Top 5 D with QB1 statistically insignificant relationship (139 cases)
  • Top 5 QB with K +.9 points better than alternative at similar price (684 cases)
  • Top 5 K with QB1 +2.2 points better than alternative at similar price (127 cases)
  • Top 10 RB with WR1 statistically insignificant relationship (620 cases)
  • Top 15 WR with RB1 +0.8 points better than alternative at similar price (672 cases)
  • Top 10 RB with TE1 statistically insignificant relationship (920 cases)
  • Top 5 TE with RB1 +1.6 points better than alternative at similar price (290 cases)
  • Top 10 RB with D +0.6 points better than alternative at similar price (1034 cases)
  • Top 5 D with RB1 statistically insignificant relationship (196 cases)
  • Top 10 RB with K +0.9 points better than alternative at similar price (1211 cases)
  • Top 5 K with RB1 +1.9 points better than alternative at similar price (264 cases)
  • Top 15 WR with TE1 statistically insignificant relationship (1258 cases)
  • Top 5 TE with WR1 statistically insignificant relationship (324 cases)
  • Top 15 WR with D statistically insignificant relationship (1556 cases)
  • Top 5 D with WR1 statistically insignificant relationship (293 cases)
  • Top 15 WR with K +0.8 points better than alternative at similar price (2028 cases)
  • Top 5 K with WR1 +1.6 points better than alternative at similar price (285 cases)
  • Top 5 TE with D statistically insignificant relationship (493 cases)
  • Top 5 D with TE1 statistically insignificant relationship (383 cases)
  • Top 5 TE with K +0.9 points better than alternative at similar price (632 cases)
  • Top 5 K with TE1 statistically insignificant relationship (388 cases)
  • Top 5 D with K +3.0 points better than alternative at similar price (600 cases)
  • Top 5 K with D +2.9 points better than alternative at similar price (471 cases)

Take-aways:

  • Stacking top QBs with their offensive team-mates is highly suggested
  • Beside top QB/WR stacks, top K/D stacks offer the most expected benefit.
  • Most of the intra-team top stacks have a positive expected return over the alternative, a handful of stacks do not have significant advantages over an alternative, but pairing a top 5 QB with their Defense is the only negative stack on a team.

Using any of these positive correlations should be safe advice in any cash games. More research needs to be done into potential upside/limits and application in GPPs. Hopefully, you can leave this better informed about making stacking decisions in your FanDuel lineups. Hope to see you in the FanDuel Lobby looking for your next mark... and I hope I'm not it.

Finally, I’d be remissed if I critiqued the RotoViz Correlation Matrix without providing some alternative.



Related Fantasy Football

NFL DFS: Wildcard Picks for DraftKings and FanDuel

NFL DFS: Wildcard Picks for DraftKings and FanDuel

3:13pm EST 1/11/24

Six games ... and a lot of difficult decisions. Let's run through an exciting DFS slate on FanDuel and DraftKings ahead of Wild Card Weekend.

Read More »
Premium Content Premium ContentWeek 18 DraftKings Cash-Game Picks

Week 18 DraftKings Cash-Game Picks

12:33pm EST 1/7/24

Top DraftKings picks at every position for Week 18 head-to-head and 50/50 contests.

Read More »
Premium Content Premium ContentWeek 18 DraftKings Tournament Picks

Week 18 DraftKings Tournament Picks

10:01pm EST 1/6/24

Top stacks and positional targets for Week 18 DraftKings tournaments.

Read More »
Premium Content Premium ContentWeek 18 FanDuel Tournament Picks

Week 18 FanDuel Tournament Picks

9:22am EST 1/6/24

Week 18 is always tough to predict, but there are still edges to be found. See where to turn in Week 18 FanDuel tournaments.

Read More »
Premium Content Premium ContentWeek 18 FanDuel Cash-Game Picks

Week 18 FanDuel Cash-Game Picks

5:04pm EST 1/5/24

With many key players resting, Week 18 FanDuel cash games figure to be the wild west. Let's see who's set to deliver DFS value.

Read More »
Week 17 DraftKings Cash-Game Picks

Week 17 DraftKings Cash-Game Picks

10:45pm EST 12/30/23

Top DraftKings picks at every position for Week 17 head-to-head and 50/50 contests.

Read More »
Premium Content Premium ContentWeek 17 DraftKings Tournament Picks

Week 17 DraftKings Tournament Picks

10:41pm EST 12/30/23

Top stacks and positional targets for Week 17 DraftKings tournaments.

Read More »
Other rankings are stale  before the 2nd round.

Draft using the best dynamic tool in the industry. Our fantasy player valuations (DMVP) change during your draft in response to...

  1. Exact league settings - direct sync
  2. Opponent and Team Needs
  3. Positional scarcity & available players
  4. Ceiling, injury risk, ADP, and more!

You need a dynamic cheat sheet that easily live-syncs with your draft board and adapts throughout your draft using 17 crucial indicators.

Get your Draft War Room Today
Winning Your League Starts Here Trophy
Why Wouldn’t You Invest
$36 to Win Your League?
Check out thisleague-winning info
2023 Draft Package Now - Sept 15

$39

Get Instant Access
2023 In-Season Package Sept 5 - Mar 7

$39

Get Access Sept. 5
2023 DFS Package Sept 5 - Mar 7

$49

Get Access Sept. 5
Best Value – All Access Pass
DS Insider Membership All 3 Packages

$127 $36

Semi-annual
Get Instant Access
Draft War Room Included Draft War Room Draft War Room Draft War Room Included Draft War Room
Unlimited Live-Draft Sync Included Unlimited Live-Draft Sync Unlimited Live-Draft Sync Unlimited Live-Draft Sync Included Unlimited Live-Draft Sync
Award-Winning Player Rankings Included Award-Winning Player Rankings Award-Winning Player Rankings Award-Winning Player Rankings Included Award-Winning Player Rankings
3D Projections Included 3D Projections 3D Projections 3D Projections Included 3D Projections
In-Depth Player Profiles Included In-Depth Player Profiles In-Depth Player Profiles In-Depth Player Profiles Included In-Depth Player Profiles
Mock Draft Trainer Included Mock Draft Trainer Mock Draft Trainer Mock Draft Trainer Included Mock Draft Trainer
DMVP Trade Values Included DMVP Trade Values DMVP Trade Values DMVP Trade Values Included DMVP Trade Values
The Perfect Draft Included The Perfect Draft The Perfect Draft The Perfect Draft Included The Perfect Draft
Breakout & Comeback Player Included Breakout & Comeback Player Breakout & Comeback Player Breakout & Comeback Player Included Breakout & Comeback Player
Average Draft Position by Scoring Included Average Draft Position by Scoring Average Draft Position by Scoring Average Draft Position by Scoring Included Average Draft Position by Scoring
Scientific Injury Predictor Included Scientific Injury Predictor Scientific Injury Predictor Scientific Injury Predictor Included Scientific Injury Predictor
Insider Sleepers & Busts Included Insider Sleepers & Busts Insider Sleepers & Busts Insider Sleepers & Busts Included Insider Sleepers & Busts
In-Season Weekly Rankings In-Season Weekly Rankings Included In-Season Weekly Rankings In-Season Weekly Rankings Included In-Season Weekly Rankings
“Who Should I Start?” Tool “Who Should I Start?” Tool Included “Who Should I Start?” Tool “Who Should I Start?” Tool Included “Who Should I Start?” Tool
“Team Intel” Tool w/ Analysis & Notifications “Team Intel” Tool w/ Analysis & Notifications Included “Team Intel” Tool w/ Analysis & Notifications “Team Intel” Tool w/ Analysis & Notifications Included “Team Intel” Tool w/ Analysis & Notifications
Live-Sync Free Agent Finder Live-Sync Free Agent Finder Included Live-Sync Free Agent Finder Live-Sync Free Agent Finder Included Live-Sync Free Agent Finder
Trade Navigator Trade Navigator Included Trade Navigator Trade Navigator Included Trade Navigator
Player Shares Player Shares Included Player Shares Player Shares Included Player Shares
In-Depth Free Agent Gems In-Depth Free Agent Gems Included In-Depth Free Agent Gems In-Depth Free Agent Gems Included In-Depth Free Agent Gems
Buy/Sell/Hold Trade Advice Buy/Sell/Hold Trade Advice Included Buy/Sell/Hold Trade Advice Buy/Sell/Hold Trade Advice Included Buy/Sell/Hold Trade Advice
Strength-of-Schedule Data Strength-of-Schedule Data Included Strength-of-Schedule Data Strength-of-Schedule Data Included Strength-of-Schedule Data
DFS Lineup Builder DFS Lineup Builder DFS Lineup Builder Included DFS Lineup Builder Included DFS Lineup Builder
DFS Ownership Projections DFS Ownership Projections DFS Ownership Projections Included DFS Ownership Projections Included DFS Ownership Projections
Weekly Top Stacks Weekly Top Stacks Weekly Top Stacks Included Weekly Top Stacks Included Weekly Top Stacks
High-Stakes DFS Line-up Reviews High-Stakes DFS Line-up Reviews High-Stakes DFS Line-up Reviews Included High-Stakes DFS Line-up Reviews Included High-Stakes DFS Line-up Reviews
DFS Independent DFS Independent DFS Independent Included DFS Independent Included DFS Independent
Premium Insider Articles Included Premium Insider Articles Included Premium Insider Articles Included Premium Insider Articles Included Premium Insider Articles
Daily FF Email Updates Included Daily FF Email Updates Included Daily FF Email Updates Included Daily FF Email Updates Included Daily FF Email Updates
Breaking News Updates Included Breaking News Updates Included Breaking News Updates Included Breaking News Updates Included Breaking News Updates
To-the-Minute Game Day Inactives Included To-the-Minute Game Day Inactives Included To-the-Minute Game Day Inactives Included To-the-Minute Game Day Inactives Included To-the-Minute Game Day Inactives
All-Access Draft Sharks App All–Access Draft Sharks App Included All-Access Draft Sharks App Included All-Access Draft Sharks App Included All-Access Draft Sharks App Included All-Access Draft Sharks App
Get Instant Access Get Access Sept 5 Get Access Sept 5 Get Instant Access

Turn your phone into a draft weapon with our FREE APP

Download on the App Store Get It on Google Play